The world's natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do?
It is true that the consumption of natural resources has significantly increased in many parts of the world. This causes a variety of potential issues and needs people to take some immediate measures in order to address the issues.
Over-exploiting natural resources can be primarily responsible for some drawbacks, directly affecting not only humans but also nature. One of them is the extremely remarkable increase in environmental contamination, particularly in air and water pollution, which is on red alert. For example, more people are suffering from respiratory diseases owing to the decrease in air quality. Another consequence is that natural resources such as fossil fuels are exhausted. A possible scenario could lead to a fuel war on a global scale, threatening all humans’ lives and civilization.
However, I believe that people are able to handle it by adopting prompt methods. One of the solutions is to promote public awareness about saving energy. By declining ticket prices for buses or trains, the authorities could encourage people to use public transportation instead of relying on their individual ones, remarkably contributing to a declining level of emissions and the exploitation of fossil fuels. The second measure is to focus on researching and investing in more alternative sources such as solar, wind, and nuclear energies than in other traditional ones. Hardly those sources contain harmful substances towards humans and nature, meaning that people might save natural resources for their next generations.
In conclusion, increasing demands for natural energies pose some threats to the community. However, this can be tackled by applying some of the steps, such as improving their awareness and using alternative powers.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-12-30 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
2022-11-09 | giangngoc | 61 | view |
2021-05-23 | Quy Hien | 77 | view |
2020-04-25 | Duy Dr.Diago Tran | 67 | view |
2020-02-20 | Quyenhaidang | 84 | view |
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is a major problem What are the causes of this How can this be solved 84
- Some people think that the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Forested Land 56
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Hardly' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...nergies than in other traditional ones. Hardly those sources contain harmful substance...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...owever, this can be tackled by applying some of the steps, such as improving their awarenes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52962962963 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0716389284 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625925925926 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1449479624 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104924359425 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403917106426 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504227247941 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762340526095 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402737395076 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.