One of the most contemporary issues that receive concerns from various parts of the world is an alarming rate of indifference towards social relationships including family bonds and friend connections. It is the fact that there has been an increasing number of people who are restless in pursuit of money making without sufficient time with family and friends. In the following paragraphs, the causes would be analyzed with the effects being indicated.
First and foremost, this trend could be attributed to some factors that should be taken into consideration. A justification is that daily expenses have been increasing day by day, which often requires both husband and wife to put a strain on earning money to cater for essential demands. Another trigger is the globalization era which raises the level of fierce international competition in the workplace. Particularly, people are faced with harder and tougher work which oblige worker to incessantly improve themself, and as a result, their leisure time which should have been spent on family activities and hanging out with friends is taken up.
It is can undeniable that this problem have adverse impacts on individuals and the whole society. To begin with, apathy in a family could create an intangible distance which contributes to the rate of conflict and misunderstanding among members, leading to the increasing rate of divorce cases. Moreover, children who lack parents’ care and empathy, easily being lured by bad peers who might launch them onto the path of crimes. Last but not least, relationships surrounding people would be broken and hard to maintain if they did not receive deserved attention.
In conclusion, this phenomenon could be provoked by a number of different reasons which result in several consequences. Only when governments and individuals make concerted efforts could this trend be efficiently handled.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- We can see more disasters and violence shown on TV What are its causes and what effects will they exert on the individual and the society 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'canned'.
Suggestion: canned
...out with friends is taken up. It is can undeniable that this problem have adver...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35785953177 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96133025032 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628762541806 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0484289043 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199551836099 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650387447545 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659953630938 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114957603507 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538051925189 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.