Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in evert subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about whether the same number of male and female students in every subjects is accepted by universities. This essay disagrees that it may be hard to apply this selecting system and the traditional system should be maintained for the reasons bellow.
First and foremost, selecting the equal number of students from each gender can be difficult to apply in reallife. This is because it is hard to measure the exact proportion of male and female students. For example, some particular subjects attract more applicants from one gender than another, such as technology or mathematics. In addition, this system would require some professional individuals in IT to operate.
Furthermore, I believe that the traditional selecting system should be maintain rather than the new one. The reason is if some applicants who are interested in some subjects but not be chosen as the number of male or female students in that course are enough, it is unequal for them. Additionally, students of both gender should be respected and selected for the courses by their hard work and their capabilities rather than their gender.
In conclusion, this essay supports the idea that students should be selected by universities for the courses not by their gender, but for their talents and diligence.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-01-04 | uyenhuynh2 | 56 | view |
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in evert subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Advertising are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it positive or negative development 56
- An English speaking friend is coming to study in your town next year and has written asking for information and advice Write a letter to your friend In your letter Offer a place to live for him her Give advice about how to find a part time job Give inform
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative aources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or negative development 78
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what exent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maintained'?
Suggestion: maintained
... traditional selecting system should be maintain rather than the new one. The reason is ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 212.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18867924528 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81363080981 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1197609552 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196235313692 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087602465344 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679013068493 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132945019806 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401228203815 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.