More tasks at home and work are being done by robots. Do the pros outweigh the cons?
Like many other domains, houses and workplaces have witnessed the increasing involvement of technology in recent years. From my perspective, despite possible over-reliance on robots and unemployment, this phenomenon brings about more good than bad due to higher performance, reduced accidents and its solution to labour shortages.
On the one hand, technological participation could pose several threats to humans. Firstly, over-dependence on automatic devices can arise as robots have greater productivity than human beings. Hence, this might lead to the loss of fundamental skills like cooking skills or problem-solving skills. Another consequence of allowing machines to do housework and professional tasks is unemployment, especially among manual workers. Given that companies can receive a higher yield with robots and do not need to pay wages, employers would prefer them to human workers, which later results in social unrest.
However, there are more merits than demerits of this tendency. The first advantage is the greater efficiency of automatic devices as they are pre-programmed and require no rest. Therefore, an enormous amount of time would be saved, enabling humans to do other tasks like relaxing or socializing. Additionally, various accidents can be avoided if organizations apply technological advances to dangerous works such as mining or construction, thus saving several millions of dollars for insurance fees and legal fees. Finally, the labour shortage in many developed countries like Japan, Germany and Korea would be solved as a sophisticated machine can replace hundreds of workers, relieving pressure on seeking the workforce from other nations.
In conclusion, although there are some problems attached to machinery interference, it is evident that automation in homes and workplaces has brought about significant social and financial benefits.
- The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 73
- The bar chart shows expectations for change of European young people in the next 20 years in five different areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 84
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 73
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university Do the advantaged of having a gap year outweigh its disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81588447653 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16669679077 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675090252708 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7604836886 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.923076923 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144837645632 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434328641204 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366390787419 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730941996213 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032259935437 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.