The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of visitor to England who went to four separate tourist attractions in Brighton between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it is clean that the percentage visiting the Pavilion and the Pier increased over the period, while the proportion of traveler to other attractions fell.
In 1980, only 10% of tourist to England went to Pier. Despite some minor fluctuations, this figure rose from around 9% in 1990 to 22% in 2010. The percentage visiting the Pavilion also increased, from approximately 23% in 1980 to almost 50% in 1995. However, this figure then decreased significantly, to about 35% in 2000 and then to roughly 31% in 2010, slightly higher than the Festival.
The most popular Brighton attraction in 1980 for visitors to England was the Festival. Although 30% of these attended the Festival in 1980, by 2010 this percentage had fallen slightly to 28%. In 1980, the figure for tourist to the Art Gallery was 21%. It then grew to a peak of around 38%, before falling noticeably/dramatically to exactly 20% in 1990. It continued to drop to less than 10% in 2010. It was, therefore, the least popular attraction at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2023-01-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | kissbiss | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | kissbiss | 78 | view |
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 67
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 67
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 401, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...inued to drop to less than 10% in 2010. It was, therefore, the least popular attra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96148611342 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4667293233 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159213605341 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608029338419 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727550527427 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123189646122 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839521342553 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.