The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005
The diagram illustrates how the price of 800 grams of four categories of bread in one particular European nation changed during the 2001-2005 period, starting from 2001. Units were measured in Euros.
Overall, there was an increase in the price of brown, white, and rye bread, while wholegrain bread witnessed a drastic fluctuation. In addition, brown bread had the highest figures throughout the period.
Regarding wholegrain bread, the price started at 0.8 in 2001, after which it experienced a sharp rise in 2002, recording 1.8. Afterward, the price witnessed a considerable decline, before ending the period at 0.8 in 2005.
The figure for brown bread was 0.6 in 2001. It moved in parallel with rye and white bread, reaching a peak at 1.6 in 2003. Then the price fluctuated marginally, registering at 1.6.
0.6 Euros was the price of white bread in2001, then it experienced a twofold rise in 2004, before ending the period at 1.5 in 2005. Similar changes, but to a lesser extent, can be seen in the figure for rye bread from 2002 to 2005, which increased from 0.5 to 0.7.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at Forton Valley City from 2000 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy 70
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 24 02 2019 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 67
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9347826087 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60062156305 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5996350638 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306674509739 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124988582109 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111272151852 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182588968658 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986290868036 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.