Nowadays, more and more people use online shopping. Some people think it is a good development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, online shopping attracts more and more people. The popularity of this shopping form arouses a lot of controversial arguments among consumers about whether it affects positively or not. From my perspective, I completely agree with those who consider this tendency a considerable development in the shopping industry, providing good chances for both shoppers and sellers.
Compared to conventional shopping, internet shopping provides consumers with numerous positive experiences. With shoppers who do not have enough free time to go to physical stores, the online form allows them to purchase goods from far distances anytime, anywhere, on any net available device. Besides, the prices of goods are usually more affordable than those bought in stores because of slash sales, holiday sales, or discounts, … which are offered frequently by E-commercial websites and sellers. Moreover, consumers can easily compare prices among different shops only by clicks rather than being shopped around as traditional shopping.
On sellers’ aspects, the advent of e-commerce brings positive effects to their business. First of all, this form helps retailers save a big amount of money, especially suits start-up companies that have tight budgets. Running an online business cuts off expenses on hiring locations; therefore, they can consider decreasing the cost of each product to attract more customers. On the other hand, for those who manage a conventional business, online service is a considerate option helping them increase their profits. In addition, this shopping type encourages more people to launch their businesses with small capital, lowering risks for new sellers.
In conclusion, I believe that the popularity of online shopping is a significant step in shopping, impacting positively not only customers but also service providers.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy 70
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 67
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 73
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 24 02 2019 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'cut'?
Suggestion: cut
...ght budgets. Running an online business cuts off expenses on hiring locations; there...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69064748201 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8550276095 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665467625899 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2741841222 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.692307692 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206102330537 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715368989953 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675888920546 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119499940779 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048526033609 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.