Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people assume that individuals who could work independently and think innovatively should be recruited by companies, although some people argue conversely, meaning that companies should recruit individuals working collectively. This essay will discuss both sides and provide a conclusion at the end.
On the proponent side, it can be said that some companies would look for employee who has capability to manage their task freely in order to enhance companies’ income. It means that workers do not have to participate in employee’s training program so that companies could possibly save their money. In addition, those who support this statement believe that companies focusing on sale products should focus on their products innovation. In order to do that, they require workers who could work and consider inventively. For instance, employees having capability to think inventively tend to be taken by star-up companies.
On the opponent side, it is believed that team work is significant for company development since all staff would work collectively in order to level up company’s income. By this, those who accept this idea admit that one employee will cover another employee’s weakness so that they could possibly finish their task fast. Furthermore, in some industries, they prefer to choose individuals that obey the instructions as their employees in order that there is no such a mistake that is caused by less obedient workers.
Taking everything into account, it seems to me that team work and following instruction at work place should be done by employees. In order to raise company’s income, all employees require ability to do team work and always obey the instruction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | jany01 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | gwyneth+12 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | stsoutsold | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | moctutuyen | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 78
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in team and follow instructions Discuss both views and 73
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 67
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- In order to solve traffic problems government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ee’s training program so that companies could possibly save their money. In addition, those wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...nother employee’s weakness so that they could possibly finish their task fast. Furthermore, in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, if, look, so, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36194029851 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91297966793 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559701492537 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4568298715 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32624726535 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116069370128 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115816941034 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223914105939 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123243408879 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.