Some people think that government should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activities. Discuss both views and give your opinions
Opinions are divided into whether dangerous sports should be banned in order to protect the citizens or whether people can play any outdoor activities that they want. Although I acknowledge the logic behind the former view, I am still in favor of the latter.
Authorities should impose a ban on playing dangerous sports because it can have adverse effects on the physical health of the players. Take boxing, for example, although before playing, the players are introduced to the laws, when they are playing, they can be punched in some weak parts of the body. As a result, they can be received bad injuries which can affect their quality of life or even die. Another possible argument is that playing dangerous activities can also affect traffic. For instance, when playing skateboarding, the players can go into the streets, and roads so that someone who does not pay attention to them can hit them which can lead to serious accidents.
Nevertheless, I also think that people should freely choose the sports or outdoor exercises that they want to play. First and foremost, with the development of society, many protective clothes are invented to adapt to the demand, and hobbies of the players. This means that people can have a variety of choices to buy these clothes which can also help them to protect themselves from bad injuries like falling or bleeding. Secondly, dangerous sports are really exciting and funny. This means that they have opportunities to enjoy themselves and bring new feelings.
In conclusion, It is understandable why some people think that dangerous sports can be really harmful and should be prohibited. However, I think people should be allowed to play any sports that they enjoy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-11 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 73
- The use of social media such as Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact in everyday life Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Despite increasing access to education a significant number of people cannot read or write What are the disadvantages and what action should the government take 61
- In conclusion despite the potential benefits of using social media the drawbacks involved are of greater significance 78
- Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of these views and give 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew, I am still in favor of the latter. Authorities should impose a ban on playi...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m which can lead to serious accidents. Nevertheless, I also think that people s...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...joy themselves and bring new feelings. In conclusion, It is understandable why ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01403508772 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6022837237 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.85504196 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264683700846 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113925483304 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112893537871 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209567154544 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102029786248 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew, I am still in favor of the latter. Authorities should impose a ban on playi...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m which can lead to serious accidents. Nevertheless, I also think that people s...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...joy themselves and bring new feelings. In conclusion, It is understandable why ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01403508772 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6022837237 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.85504196 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264683700846 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113925483304 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112893537871 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209567154544 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102029786248 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.