The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given line graph gives information about how many percentage of 5 different activities that old
people in America expenditured on spare time from 1980 to 2010.
What stands out from the line graph is that while the theatre declined, others activities had an upward
trend. In addition, Hiking was the most steadily increased during the given period.
In 1980, starting at three fifths watching TV was the highest before it witnessed a slightly improve to
about two thirds in 2010. In contrast, after ranked second in 1980 with a half, theatre noticeably reduce
to around morethan two fifths at the end of the period. The rate of reading troubled after some rise and
fall between 1980 and 2010 with less than a third and three fifths respectively.
Besides, it was hiking that started from a fifth before experiencing a steadily surge to become the
highest in 2010, at four fifth. Surfing the internet was the lowest in 1980 with just roughly one in twenty.
However, the ratio of surfing internet which was saw a considerably soar to a half in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 100
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 56
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
... line graph gives information about how many percentage of 5 different activities that old peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 27, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y improve to about two thirds in 2010. In contrast, after ranked second in 1980 w...
^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('surge') instead of another adjective.
...tarted from a fifth before experiencing a steadily surge to become the highest in 2010, at four...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 50, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...the ratio of surfing internet which was saw a considerably soar to a half in 2010. ...
^^^
Line 11, column 54, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('soar') instead of another adjective.
...ratio of surfing internet which was saw a considerably soar to a half in 2010.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88461538462 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50586198385 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2873264821 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130809767463 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543876094933 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459722657986 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545326633939 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442746825475 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.