There is often debated about whether people should be open to taking risks or not. While there are some merit in taking risks, I believe its main drawbacks are more substantial.
On the one hand, going out from comfort-zone can bring about numerous benefits and sometimes leads to significant alteration in one's life. That is to say, several workers are not content with their jobs that can be as a result of low salary or sense of being exploit by bosses. However, even with the status quo they continue to work as they afraid of being jobless and struggle to afford day-to-day expenses. But if they take the risk of resigning the job, it is more likely to find better employment and consequently flourished life will await them. This can be supported by numerous real cases in which people due stepping out from their comfort and safe area could made countless differences in their life.
On the other hand, sometimes people lose everything by choosing to do critical actions. The dream of being one-night billioner has made youngsters to think irrationally and gamble their whole property. Having said that, it is true that sometimes it can be fruitful but almost 90% of them facing unfortunate result. To illustrate, I happen to know a cuple who sold their home to buy Bitcoins to gain profit, but after a sharp decline in the price of that coin they lost their home which was the result of their years of saving. After this incident, they suffered a lot, both mentally and financially and finally end up divorcing. Unfortunately, not everyone recieve adequate education and knowledge regarding how to be open to risk in a way they are not losing everything.
In conclusion, despite seeing some benefits under certain circumstances, I believe the drawbacks of taking risks override the merits.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 89
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...imes leads to significant alteration in ones life. That is to say, several workers a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: I_AFRAID[2]
Message: You miss the verb here. You should rather write: 'they're afraid'.
Suggestion: they're afraid
...the status quo they continue to work as they afraid of being jobless and struggle to afford...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
... from their comfort and safe area could made countless differences in their life. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, however, if, regarding, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90522875817 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66022907753 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2294864358 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200738520198 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673578126627 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488777430595 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129174270716 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220121385435 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.