In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people earn.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is no doubt that everyone desires a decent compensation from the organizations in which they work. However, many analysts believe that the government authority should take initiatives to monitor salaries and to reduce the amount of compensation earned by a few professionals in some developed nations, though I agree with the scholars who opine that earning high wages is beneficial for a domain.
With regards to the view of controlling and limiting the compensation, the government can mitigate money laundering and disparity in the organization and society if it manages the amount, which is paid to a few corporate professionals. Firstly, some employees earning terribly high compensations may involve in money laundering, which can be prevented through limiting the salaries of the top professionals in the organizations. Secondly, if direct workers who are not in top positions get discouraged because of unfair salaries of a few individuals, government can ensure equality in the organizations and society by reducing the disparity of compensations of few individuals. However, a common question may come in mind that controlling salaries may lead the talented professionals to migrate to another country.
In terms of the opinions of other group of people with whom I agree, earning high salaries by individuals ultimately benefits the nation since it ensures economical improvement. When workers earn more salaries and wages, a portion of their income is deducted as income tax revenue for the government that can be invested in profitable projects such as creating power station, building infrastructures etc. As a result, foreign inventors get interested to invest their money in the country that creates more employment opportunity for people, who can enjoy a high standard of living.
In conclusion, though some people believe that the government should be responsible for controlling and limiting the salaries of people because it mitigate money laundering and disparity among people, I firmly believe with other’s view that earning high compensation is a merit for a nation as it ensures economic development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | TM1994 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | TM1994 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | manu_kaur113 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | chhinakaur | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | Shiv rana | 25 | view |
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 73
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people earn Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 61
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people earn Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while other think that we can improve our intelligence through learning Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mitigates'?
Suggestion: mitigates
...iting the salaries of people because it mitigate money laundering and disparity among pe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49090909091 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21917464569 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6444971037 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.2 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366643788522 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138424004702 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105327852237 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23793851012 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825334128405 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mitigates'?
Suggestion: mitigates
...iting the salaries of people because it mitigate money laundering and disparity among pe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49090909091 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21917464569 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6444971037 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.2 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366643788522 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138424004702 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105327852237 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23793851012 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825334128405 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.