It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
More governments are showing great concern related to the extinction of animal species. When this issue comes into view, there exist conflicting opinions. Some people share the view that the extinction of many species is a natural process. Therefore, people are not able to take steps to stop this problem from continuing. From my point of view, I wholeheartedly disagree with this point and will support my argument in the essay below.
To begin with, the most important argument against this point of view is that humans are the indirect cause of extinction. To be more specific, it is obvious that people increasingly burn fossil fuels, cut down trees and farm livestock day by day. That contributes to climate change and the earth's temperature which lower many species' survival rates. This is because global warming results in less food, less reproduction and interfering with the environment for native wildlife. According to the statistics on the IUCN Red List of threatened species, climate change currently affects at least 10,967 species, increasing the likelihood of their extinction. For that reason, people are indirectly leading to the extinction of animal species.
In addition, humans are also the immediate cause of extinction. The most frequent factor contributing to this view is that these days people increasingly use many products whose main material is from animals. For example, rhinoceros are killed by poachers for their horns, which are bought and sold on the black markets for high prices, leading to most living rhinoceros species being considered endangered. As a matter of fact, rhinos are under threat. To clarify, over 7,100 African rhinos have been killed in the last 10 years. Consequently, natural processes are not all responsible for the extinction of animal species. Hence, people should change their actions to prevent animals from extinction.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that animal extinction is attributed to humans' actions. Thus, people should find ways to reverse this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- One of the best methods to motivate and encourage workers is to pay them according to what they produce or sell Do you think this is the best method Give relevant examples from your experience 67
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 84
- Some people think that radio is the best way to get news while others think that television is better for this purpose Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- Some parents think that advertisements are misleading for children while advertisers claim that they provide knowledge Discuss both view 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...t contributes to climate change and the earths temperature which lower many species su...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, at least, for example, in addition, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3487654321 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76147996642 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3513689456 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.65 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271283714174 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840008731921 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750839983749 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168467120824 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459513995528 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.