Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people think that learners entering universities need tuition support from the government. In this essay, although I find full scholarships a reasonable method for helping the poor students or the excellent candidates, the education budgets in developing countries are deposited in order to reinvest in future education infrastructure.
On the one hand, the governments should provide full financial help to special students. First of all, paying full cost of learning at universities allows poor students who come from low income families to reduce their financial burden. As a result, these students should focus on studying only, thus gaining necessary knowledges. This is perfect platform for graduates to have a well-paid job. Moreover, generating full scholarships encourages excellent learners to pay full time on researching and finding out new inventions when they are at university. This results in producing talented scientists or great contributors in the next generations. These evidences could enable the government to plan a high education budget to aid these students who need financial supports.
On the other hand, covering all fees of studying universities for all students is not significant because upgrading institution infrastructure and other sufficient financial aids could make university costs more comfortable. Specifically, investing in modern and high tech education infrastructures could allow the students who live in remote provinces to access online courses, thus these students can save the high costs of commuting and accommodation in expensive cities. As a result, they can cover their learning fees after high school, therefore, there are less out-cash flows and more in-cash flows of the government budget to reinvest in the education infrastructure. Additionally, there are several sufficient financial aids which generate a comfortable learning path for students. Example, the state bank of Vietnam has a loan package with a low interest rate to help students fulfill university fees. This means these students only give period principals and cheap interests after they finish university programms and have a job. A brief summary, this essay also mentions education infrastructure upgrades and learning loan packages instead of focusing on free full fees.
In conclusion, the bill of education fees should be on the government that is significant to some special situations while popular education loans and upgrading studying institutions can make the student life more leisure.
- many people try to balance work and other parts of their life However this is very difficult to do what are the problems of this what is the best way to achieve a better balance 81
- The charts below give information about the world s top three producers for four different dairy products milk cheese butter milk powder in the year of 2012 67
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 78
- Many students find it harder to study when they are at university or college than when they were at school Why is this What can be done to solve the problem 84
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ps encourages excellent learners to pay full time on researching and finding out new inve...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1131, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to loan'
Suggestion: to loan
...on infrastructure upgrades and learning loan packages instead of focusing on free fu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69393139842 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08772741825 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548812664908 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4866315135 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.941176471 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27801057057 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882426556737 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353556793163 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173409306762 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451135474961 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.