The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides information about the rate of
fast food which was consumpted by adolescant in
Mauritian over 30 years from 1985 to 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that there were 2 opposite trends
for these 3 figures. While the proportion of fried chicken
and hamburgers consumpted witnessed a progress, the
number of spending on pizza reduced over the same
period.
Looking at the chart for more details, it can be seen that
the percentage of fried chicken used had the lowest
point in 1985, at nearly 10%, but then it improved
enormously from 1985 to 2005. finally, it remained
statically over 5 years and grew up slightly at the last
year. The similar trend was true for hamburgers, starting
at 10%, the number of hamburgers consumpted was
higher than the fried chicken consumpted, at 5%. then it
upsurged tremedously between 1985 and 2015, at 70%.
Turning to the last figure, the rate of pizza used by
Mauritian teenagers was 60% in 1985, which was the
highest percentage of the chart, then it dropped
significantly over the 30 years later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | Anh15799 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | Anh15799 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 48
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 78
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 31, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...improved enormously from 1985 to 2005. finally, it remained statically over 5 years a...
^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 50, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...an the fried chicken consumpted, at 5%. then it upsurged tremedously between 1985 a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98901098901 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61893747047 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5513581169 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 3.83414634146 522% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133266696246 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062364789192 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641598307785 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425100876201 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482928888703 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.