Task 2: The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school, to what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that joining in team sports at school is the most effective method to teach pupils to collaborate. I totally concur with this opinion as team sports can make them enhance some momentous elements in cooperating.
It is obvious that team sports shape essential characters for students to become better team workers. First, when enrolling in team sports, children can have a more robust sense of team spirit. To illustrate, being a team player acquire them to live in harmony with others and help teammates go through hurdles in order to reach the team’s goal. The second merit is that they can promote communication skill, an important key of successful teams. If children are members in team sports, they need to interact with others more, such as confiding about their difficulties, mobilizing their co-workers, deliberating with coach. Hence, they can have a more subtle way of communicating.
Moreover, school team sports bring some positive developments in team working for children. Foremost, they can learn how to solve conflicts in a team. It is inevitable that they have some arguments with others. At that time, they need to negotiate in order to come up to a resonable decision. Lastly, thanks to working in team sports at school, they can have more confidence in cooperating in future. That will make them more eager, experienced and it is easier for them to make a new conservation with new team, the positive attitude on team working.
In conclusion, teamsport is the best opportunity for children to lay a robust foundation in cooperating
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | tracywu | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | thu200212 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | minh phương phạm hồng | 56 | view |
- Task 1 The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1984 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Task 2 Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it is necessary but others are of the opinion that it is unfair Discuss both views and give your own opinions 73
- Task 1 The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
- The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- Task 1 The chart below shows the percentage of a drug company s total sales by region from 2002 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...can have more confidence in cooperating in future. That will make them more eager, experi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05384615385 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83376722516 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9780321188 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235420260201 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900229895102 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673136538705 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157142898652 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230727048862 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.