Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation? What is your opinion?
The problem that whether ameliorating roads and highways or public transportation is more important has become a subject of debate. While some people argue that government funding should be invested more in transportation system, I’m more convinced that it is more necessary to allocate part of government budget to improve the quality of transportation rather than roads and highways. This essay will give some reasons about my opinion.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the investment in public transportation brings benefit to human. The mainly reason is that travelling more by public transportation such as bus or subway is more likely to reduce the amount of carbon footprint and save energy. Using more private vehicles possibly pollute the air which can harm people’s health and the atmosphere. Therefore, improving public transportation is a useful method to mitigate this issue. For example, the bus system is more and more widening in most countries all over the world.
On the other hand, I tend towards the notion that the investment of government should be more concentrated to improve roads and highways. First, adequate road infrastructure is more likely to ensure the safety for travelling of citizens. In fact, bad road conditions create an enormous hazard to drivers. An example can be seen as a driver may attempt to avoid unsafe situations, like a pothole or pooling water which could cause a serious accident. Therefore, developing road infrastructure is completely essential. Second, regular road maintenance also acts as a motivator to develop other economic sectors such as tourism or transportation industry. For instance, high-quality roads make the transport of commodities between rural and urban areas more convenient and efficient.
To sum up, although some people claim that government should spend more money on improving public transportation, I’m in favour of that it is more important to invest government funding in upgrading roads and highways. This plays an important role in the safety of citizens as well as evolving other related economic fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-18 | tienallen' | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | tienallen' | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | tienallen' | 73 | view |
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation What is your opinion 73
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 67
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation What is your opinion 73
- In the past people used to travel abroad to look many differences from their home country Nowadays cities throughout the world are becoming more and more similar What are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 67
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38066465257 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03559085517 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546827794562 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3958785525 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.764705882 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45738542892 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132294830308 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129642851964 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293854430854 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770198805728 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.