It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages?
These days, humans have faced various problems, especially destructing natural beauty spots to solve overpopulation and rapid urbanization. I think that people have many benefits when protecting these places, and the government and individuals should take measures to solve this problem.
Protecting the natural beauty places can bring many positive impacts on both economy and the balance of natural habitats. The first reason is that natural spots can boost the country's economy because its aim is tourist attractions. Nowadays, people, especially the young are dynamic and desire to explore the new to gain deep knowledge about ancient structures or conservation areas. As a result, the government not protects artifacts, and buildings but also makes a profit from visiting tourists that boosts the national economy. Furthermore, natural beauty spots are a part of biodiversities so if illegal activities such as poaching, and deforestation are widespread, the balance of natural habitats can be lost. Therefore, the main benefit of natural beauty spots builds up healthy ecosystems.
Both authorities and individuals should take actions to prevent the ruin of natural beauty spots. Firstly, the government should strictly ban regulations on poaching and illegal hunting to protect rare animals and plants which balance the natural habitats. Also, industrial areas should be removed far from nature to reduce hazardous emissions and noise pollution. Citizens should educate to protect natural spots and the importance of the environment in the existence of humans at early age. For instance, by following all the harsher fines and punishments of the government.
In conclusion, although natural beauty spots bring benefits to humans, it is on the verge of disappearance due to various factors. This issue can be solved with the help of the government, and the education systems.
(7.0)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-21 | giangngoc | 11 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | shivangini | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | iamketpatel | 82 | view |
- 2 7 2022 Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below shows how electricty is generated in a hydroelectronic power station 78
- 18 6 2016 Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 84
- 23 7 2022 Many people find it hard to balance their work with other parts of their lives What are the reasons for this How this problem can be overcome 84
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54325259516 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90934535901 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6073564432 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.8 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0302902670572 0.244688304435 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0128647931856 0.084324248473 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222677164401 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0273180433276 0.151304729494 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250270389231 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.