Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that raising the minimum legal age at which individuals can legally operate cars or ride motorbikes is the best strategy in order to increase road safety. To a certain extent, while I agree that this policy may decrease the number of traffic accidents, I believe that harsher punishments are more significant because of their considerable effects.
On the one hand, it is clear that a higher minimum lawful age will improve the safety of traffic participants. Reality proves that most accidents when driving are caused by youngsters due to their subjectivity, speeding, and recklessness. For example, many injuries were caused because underage drivers drank and raced too fast in the crowd. However, they don’t yet have the maturity so do not have to take responsibility before the law when engaging in dangerous behaviors. Thus, in order to safeguard themselves and other road users, raising the legal driving age may ensure that even the youngest drivers are responsible enough to do so.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that stricter rules should be banned because nowadays, young people still drive cars and ride motorbikes without a driver's license, so the above strategy may not be effective enough. Therefore, increasing the severity of the penalties for those found guilty of driving offenses may be the better way to tighten traffic safety. Let me take Vietnam as an example, a person convicted of driving while under the fluence of alcohol in Vietnam has to pay 7 million VND and revoked the license. Consequently, the number of traffic accidents is decreased significantly.
To conclude, while I support the view that increasing the minimum legal age for road users is a great way to keep safe, I believe that stricter rules far outweigh that strategy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
- Some people say that when deciding taxes government should prioritize health care Others think that there are more important priorities for tax payers money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think that living in big cities is bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table describes the changes of people in millions who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 78
- Some people say that when deciding taxes government should prioritize health care Others think that there are more important priorities for tax payers money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06418918919 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75731769267 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5188949182 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.916666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307316261022 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950964407346 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088453682318 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185518674763 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533973180623 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.