Task 2: Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
It is incontrovertible that there are some advocates of streaming in schools on the basis of academic abilities. Meanwhile, other people also argue educational institutions should divide classes without considering individual performance. As far as I am concerned, I firmly concur with the critics against favoring excellent students.
On the one hand, it is true that the selection of students according to their academic activities may bring some notable benefits for the whole classes and students themselves. Firstly, a student in classes who possess similar performance tend to progress more quickly. For those classes, students are likely to cover a lot of ground in a short time, which can help teachers tailor their teaching strategies, regardless of allocating more time to explaining their lecturers several times. Secondly, when the skills and performance of students match the materials prepared by their lecturers, they would be less likely to be out of their depth. Eventually, students tend to easily keep up with their studies, while teachers will spend less time imposing discipline rather than imparting their knowledge.
On the other hand, I would also argue that the idea of choosing students based on their academic ability should be made obsolete. I believe that an equalitarian society is much better than one in which schools just aim to educate high-flyers, who are likely to enjoy personal achievements and gain a competitive edge, instead of supporting disadvantageous people. Furthermore, favoring the academic elite means a majority of less excellent students are discriminated against and branded as failures. From the educational perspective, teachers should also raise cooperative awareness by encouraging excellent students to support other members. This can prepare them to be good team-players in real situations such as workplaces or voluntary jobs, which can provide them opportunities to get ahead in life and move up to a career ladder.
In conclusion, It seems to me that it is unwise to select students according to their academic performance. Instead, it is much better to opt for random selection procedures, which can not only efficiently ensure educational equality but also enhance the performance of all students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- Task 2 Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Task 2 People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 73
- Task 2 In some countries more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- More and more people today are choosing to eat only healthy food and are making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can be done to encourage other people to eat only healthy food and to make time to exercise regularly 84
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47428571429 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08576190439 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3857731862 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.733333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274238188697 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946475695006 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631512580221 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155166070637 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282802232937 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47428571429 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08576190439 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3857731862 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.733333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274238188697 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946475695006 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631512580221 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155166070637 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282802232937 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.