In some countries, young people have become richer, healthier, and live longer, but they are less happy. What are the causes? What can be done to address this situation?
Recently, despite the possession of several amenities, job prospects, and good healthcare services, youngsters are still uncontented. While this tendency can be attributed to numerous factors, I firmly believe that the governments can adopt different sustainable measures to tackle the current problem.
Firstly, dissatisfaction of young people towards their achievements can be ascribed to the development of advertising industry. Currently, giant advertising corporations tend to aim at youngsters as target audiences, who are like to be swayed by various types of attractive consumer products such as cosmetics, toys, or electronic devices. As a result, they tend to be encouraged to squander their saving on such goods which they are promised to bring them enjoyment. However, these products tend to be made obsolete rapidly and superseded by other trendy ones, eventually resulting in disillusionment among young people. Secondly, the gradually disappearance of social bonds is also a contributory factor for the disappointment of the youths toward the contemporary society. Due to the industrialization and hectic pace of life in urban areas, individuals have to allocate most of their time to shoulder an ever-increasing financial burden, which prevents them from entertaining and communicating with their family. Consequently, feeling of community seems to be fallen by the wayside in these concrete jungles, which can lead to many metal health problems for the youths, especially autism.
Despite the aforementioned detrimental impacts, national and local authorities can also impose different appropriate policies the cope with this phenomenon. In terms of advertising campaigns, the government should implement official ban on exaggerated marketing activities. Furthermore, educational institutions should also hold accountable for raising awareness among students and encouraging them to avoid purchasing goods impulsively. From the recreational perspective, it is also necessary to provide funding for the expansion of free-access sport infrastructure to provide opportunities for youngsters to work out and keep kit, which can effectively prevent them from time-consuming sedentary tasks. These aforementioned can be considered sustainable approaches to bring more fulfilment and happiness into the daily life of youngsters.
In conclusion, while several factors leading to the less enjoyment of young people in contemporary life can be identified, I would argue that several solutions can be also adopted to bring happiness back to the youngsters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | MEBC Class | 100 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- Task 2 Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Task 2 Today some families are not eating meals together on a daily basis Why Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 2 As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94054054054 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44123153928 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613513513514 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6343391786 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.533333333 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154634327718 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519905023344 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051072728896 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10420988429 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429876567145 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.