Task 2 The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of people

It is true that recently, there has been a dramatic growth in the population of many cities. While this tendency can possess profound effects on the lives of urban dwellers, several solutions can be employed to tackle the problem.
The mass exodus of migrants from the countryside to the urban areas can result in numerous consequences for daily life in the cities. Particularly, in terms of accommodations, an excessive increase in population density means urban infrastructure will be inadequate to cope with the daily requirements of people such as feedstock and electricity. Furthermore, a lack of housing stocks can increase homelessness and promote the appearance of shanty towns and slum areas. As a result, many inhabitants have to endure squalid housing conditions. From the societal perspective, the rapid expansion of the city population also leads to a shortage of employment. Moreover, youngsters will find more difficulties to earn a living, as well as to shoulder an ever-growing financial burden resulting from accommodations or healthcare services.
In order to maintain an acceptable quality of life for the residents, national and local authorities should impose different appropriate measures. Firstly, people should be provided access to amenities, and this could be made possible through the regulation of the policies regarding property planning and construction programs. Secondly, the government should also introduce restrictions on the number of people flooding the city centers to mitigate the excessive increment of labor and economic migrants. This approach could be an effective stopgap measure while fundings are gradually provided for the improvement of the economy in rural areas in terms of jobs, education, and healthcare systems.
In conclusion, the massive migration of people from the countryside to big cities can pose a high threat to the daily life of urban residents. Thus, action must be taken to ensure a decent quality of life for people that have been directly influenced by this tendency.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48253968254 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12093363553 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0609071497 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.357142857 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9285714286 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28606068368 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871552304116 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452984939066 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170218732683 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307388075272 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.