While many people go to university for academic study, more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, students tend to study higher education for achieving better opportunities for future jobs. However, some people find that enrollment in specific professional education might help them easily get jobs that are lacking recently. In my point of views, I believe that official education is not the only way to pursue the ideal jobs in the future.
On the one hand, traditional institutions might be the familiar way to get knowledge for a long time ago and hard to be replaced by the other methods at first. For instance, some older generations would believe that after graduation from a university, their children might find a stable job with their bachelor's degrees in hand. However, with the vast development in the modern world, there are dramatic changes in types of jobs that do not need manual workers. Therefore, an abundance of graduated students has to face with the unemployment threat since they have no other skills except theory comprehension.
On the other hand, there are new types of jobs increasing annually such as content writers, digital marketing, and developers which are related to technology or electricians, and plumbers which are specific workers that cannot be replaced by machines. Unfortunately, many people find it difficult to study the majors that relate to these positions in local traditional universities. Meanwhile, significant centres that train the skills have grown up in a short time to indulge the needs of these specific jobs. Hence, youngsters could get jobs easier after completing the training courses for there is a huge lack of workers in the new fields in recent years.
In conclusion, despite the fact that academic education is a good way to equip the needed knowledge, there are significant modern skills that still cannot convey to students. In my view, if the younger generation chooses what they want to learn wisely and flexibly, they still get a job easily with a qualification from other training centres without a bachelor's degree.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15692307692 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8266692717 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566153846154 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4630389843 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.923076923 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139947741537 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483890354618 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354719407815 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080090046961 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446582099701 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.