The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050. Units are given in percentages.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given line graph depicts the percentage of the elderly in the workforce in four nations which include France, United States, Japan and Germany over a period of 90 years between 1960 and 2050.
In general, most of the working age proportions of adults in all four countries are on a downward trend and are pretty fluctuating. Nevertheless, only the US has kept the percentage from falling below the original level.
In 1960, a glance at the graph reveals that Germany stood at the first position, which accounted for more than 65%. This is followed by Japan with 65%, three-fifths and over 60% respectively for the US and France. The percentage of working age of adults tended to progress until 1990, which made for nearby 70% for both Germany and Japan and over two thirds for France and the USA.
However, all nations had a plummet. In 2010 all four countries were in the 60% range. The US reached 60% and moved steadily for a decade. It is predicted that the proportion of France and Germany also dipped to about 55%. Japan has become the country with the lowest proportion of elderly people of working age in four countries, which took up just a little more than half.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | htngyen | view | |
| 2023-07-26 | htngyen | view | |
| 2023-03-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 73
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 73
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogress until 1990, which made for nearby 70% for both Germany and Japan and over ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67788461538 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45336967131 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552884615385 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3081053803 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190512122833 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693022849373 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573593270924 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126834080823 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390934609086 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogress until 1990, which made for nearby 70% for both Germany and Japan and over ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67788461538 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45336967131 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552884615385 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3081053803 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190512122833 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693022849373 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573593270924 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126834080823 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390934609086 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.