The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
The charts display the number of income and expense in several subjects during a year. Interestingly though, it is measured in percentage. At first glance, it was evident that the highest amount reached by donated food in revenue sources while program services was the biggest number for spending money.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to the revenue’s data, donated food was the upper number, it gained 86,6%, followed by community contributions, it was little more than one in ten. Then, program revenue made income exactly 2,2% while investment income, government grants, and other sources were have a similar number approximately 0,2%-0,4%. Thus, all of subjects had a final revenue about 53 million dollars.
Turning to the data of expenditures, the highest percentage attained by program services spending more than nine in ten whereas fundraising achieved just around 2%. Finally, management and general were the lowest number, it was counted under 2% that completed the total number of expenses would be around 53 million dollars during the period of time.
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia 78
- The chart and table show the exports earnings and percentage change in values in 2015 and 2016 89
- some movies are serious and others are to amuse and entertain 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- Some teachers think that international student exchange programs would be beneficial for all teenage school student 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...vernment grants, and other sources were have a similar number approximately 0,2%-0,4...
^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...be around 53 million dollars during the period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion dollars during the period of time.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, so, then, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35087719298 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71119335459 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643274853801 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0094331228 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0511505011499 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241589490933 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364545004825 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0399049358661 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442526096053 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.