The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart given compares a specific nation in terms of the proportion of the day working that adults spared for partaking in distinct activities in 1958 and 2008.
It is clear from the chart that during the research period, adults were prone to spend most of their time working. Additionally, all the figures experienced noticeable changes.
In 1958, the share of time used for working by adults accounted for 33% of the total, while the rate of sleeping was dwarfed by that of working, at 32%. Likewise, the figures for going out and relaxing at home were nearly 1,5 and 4 times as low as that of working, at 19% and 8% respectively. By contrast, adults tended to spare 6% of their time for other, compared to 2% of time spent travelling to work.
In 2008, there was a steady increase in the percentage of working to 42%, while that of relaxing at home was matched by a roughly similar trend to 13%. Meanwhile, the shares of sleeping and going out underwent sunbtantial drops to 25% and 6% in turn, compared to a stability witnessed in that of other, at 6%. At the same time, local residents were more likely to spend time travelling to work, at 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | brew | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits 78
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 78
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 79
- The diagrams illustrate 3 different types of bridges
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55023923445 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55487159734 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540669856459 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0185133254 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123548414464 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570584625912 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601571783081 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931661950509 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624043967279 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.