More and more business meetings and business training have taken place on the internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is claimed that online meetings or training are becoming more and more popular in the workplace. While this opinion is valid to some extent, I believe that using the internet to replace some activities in business procedures should be considered.
It is understandable why some people support the opinion that all activities should be organized offline mode due to the drawbacks of online forms. When organizing activities through the Internet, people do not have the physical connections or chances to interact face-to-face that an offline-based website can provide. These points lead to a lack of real experiences and make it difficult to evaluate the real potential or attitudes of business partners and employees. Furthermore, meetings or onboarding through the computer screen can distract people from concentration by pop-up notifications or other external environments. However, this thinking is flawed. Personalities are difficult to find out through the early-stage process, and the concentration of people does not all depend on the external elements.
Changing from offline systems to online ones in some business procedures are likely to involve more changes, requiring businesses to adapt to new developments but it also intervenes in firm developments. This new kind of meeting can be flexible in time and money for all parties or between employee and business in particular. Money is saved not only from daily workplace activities but also in fuel budget. This point can reduce pollution from vehicle pollutants and traffic jams altogether. Additionally, online meetings or training can use recording tools to save the video as documents, which facilitates people to watch again whenever they forget some details or for specialized purposes. These advantages outweigh the drawbacks online meetings can provide.
In conclusion, choosing online platforms in business procedures has its detriments but the strengths they have are worth considering.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-23 | MinhGoal1 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | ngocvuong | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | zizizizizi | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | zizizizizi | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | namanpluck | 90 | view |
- More and more business meetings and business training have taken place on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- More and more business meetings and business training have taken place on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Many employers believe that good social skills are as important as good qualifications to succeed in a job so they are employing people who are with good social skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... detriments but the strengths they have are worth considering.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61204013378 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09370152711 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571906354515 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9090846449 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.866666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263423928855 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834102552527 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726706560229 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165373070488 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758516102729 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.