Many people think good planning is a key factor for life success. Others think other factors are more important (hard working, luck, etc.). Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A group of people say that careful planning is the key to successful life, while according to some individuals there are numerous ways that lead to success such as working or fortune. This essay is going to discuss both sides in detail.
On the one hand, there are reasons why people think careful preparation plays an important role in a successful career. First of all, those who are great planners tend to live a structured life. As a result, productivity at work can be improved significantly. They will know how to achieve their goals. Secondly, having plan management skills can teach people how to predict unseen risks. The ability to think wisely helps them decide which is the good option and their lives would not go down the wrong path.
On the other hand, some people claim that other factors can decide a successful life. One of them is luck. Due to the development of the internet and social networking sites such as Tiktok, people can be viral and gain money in an easy way by posting videos. The other one is hard-working. This makes sure that people concentrate on their work and keep their passions alive. Hence, they will have the motivation to pursue their career and become successful.
In summary, I concur that both opinions have their benefits but I lean on the second one for deciding how people can have a successful life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-06 | Mike-Huang | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | vuhieuquy123 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | vuhieuquy | 71 | view |
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the inf 78
- Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves company and society Discuss and give opinion 73
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 100
- Space travel has been possible for sometime. Some people think that space tourism will probably be developed. What are the positive and negative about it?. 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople claim that other factors can decide a successful life. One of them is luck. ...
^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tok, people can be viral and gain money in an easy way by posting videos. The other one is har...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75423728814 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48490125996 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601694915254 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6545257132 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281845194328 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855523413269 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076589825257 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163088034705 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259473409309 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople claim that other factors can decide a successful life. One of them is luck. ...
^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tok, people can be viral and gain money in an easy way by posting videos. The other one is har...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75423728814 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48490125996 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601694915254 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6545257132 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281845194328 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855523413269 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076589825257 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163088034705 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259473409309 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.