It has been recently argued that constructing modern buildings requires historical buildings to be taken down for urban redevelopment purposes due to the shortage of land for development. As a result, this situation has several drawbacks that will hamper the intended benefits. This essay will explain why.
On one hand, demolition of old buildings can have a detrimental impact on the residential area nearby. This is because the dust from the building destruction is responsible for the increased level of air pollution. To be more particular, small particles could easily go into the atmosphere, thus contaminating the air near the construction area. Consequently, the residents who live nearby will face lung-related diseases, such as respiratory disorders, tuberculosis,... Not only the dwellers, but the workers may also experience the identical problem. In addition, the deafening noise of the construction progress will be bothersome for the people who live there, as their daily lives will be disturbed for a certain amount of time. As a result, the environment and the quality of life will gradually deteriorate.
On the other hand, demolishing these structures can make way for more functional and efficient buildings that better meet the needs of modern users. To be more precise, The proponents of the replacing of old structures with modern ones mention that, with the establishment of new buildings, the living standard of the whole area will be enhanced, and the value of the land will increase. For instance, the change of purpose in agricultural lands to set up shopping malls in Vietnam has brought convenience to the society. As a result, this will contribute to the country’s economy. However, I do believe that the progress the building construction inhibit is far more serious than the ads of new building .
In a nutshell, despite the benefit of setting up new buildings, the demolition of historical buildings may cause significant drawbacks for our living conditions and our environment.
- In many cities there is a lack of space to develop and as a result in order to modernize old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings Do advantages out weigh disadvantages 89
- In many cities there is a lack of space to develop and as a result in order to modernize old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings Do advantages out weigh disadvantages 56
- In many cities there is a lack of space to develop and as a result in order to modernize old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings Do advantages out weigh disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...h as respiratory disorders, tuberculosis,... Not only the dwellers, but the worker...
^^
Line 5, column 705, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ore serious than the ads of new building . In a nutshell, despite the benefit o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35109717868 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15236611284 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570532915361 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7689805168 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190183674831 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615960430542 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644914322831 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123920234479 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545779507983 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.