Task 1: The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods, rice, wheat and maize, by people in four different countries
The table compares daily calorie intake from rice, wheat, and maize of people in four different nations.
Overall, it is apparent that each country has their own preference for a particular food regarding their primary calorie sources. Another noticeable feature is that Egypt has the largest consumption of basic foods per day out of all four countries surveyed.
In terms of rice, Cambodia is the largest consumer as an average Cambodian consumes 1445 calories worth of this food daily, followed by Egyptian at 501 calories. The figures for Mexico and Poland are insignificant.
Wheat is a staple food in both Egypt and Poland with high levels of calorie intake at 1095 and 865 calories per citizens daily, respectively. In comparison, 275 calories of this product are consumed by each Mexican, while a minimal number of 18 calories are consumed by each Cambodian.
Consumers in Mexico get the majority of their energy from maize, the figure for which is 1083 calories and is nearly double that of Egypt. The Polish, on the other hand, do not eat maize.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-15 | viviannguyen | 78 | view |
2023-04-07 | boppy2811 | 84 | view |
2023-03-14 | minh phương phạm hồng | 78 | view |
- Task 1 The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods rice wheat and maize by people in four different countries 84
- Task 1 The bar chart shows the proportion of people aged over 65 years old in Germany Canada and the UK over a period of 50 years 84
- The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 73
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Could this trend have more positive or negative effects on society 61
- The bar chart shows the proportion of people aged over 65 years old in Germany Canada and the UK over a period of 50 years 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05649717514 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57479638628 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0305270494 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186221693666 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807414029721 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109453828491 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12199159989 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123802054794 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.