Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the UN convention on rights to migrants with the view to protect workers and families. The author of the reading states that although they accord liitle security, there are issues pertaining to it. The lecturer disagrees and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that it violates the immigration policies of numerous countries as certain rights goes againt the national interest. For instance, family reunification results in overpopulation of nation and thus affect the living standard of people residing there. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that convention rather prevent the migrants and families as the nations who signed the convention are compelled to follow law. In addition, they are the legal framework to protect them and provide guideline to respect and incorporate with policy.
Secondly, according to the writing, migrants are painted as being suffering from poverty yet this is not the case as they are provided the opportunity to work overseas which lead them to be economically well off. The speaker on other hand points out that their rights are actually erored in many nation restricting them to migrate internationally.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that this is a serious issue that need solution such as nation could motivate them for family planning, flourish their economy, creating opportunity and so on. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that with the increment in moving from country to country either legally or illegally , there is elevating in economic instability, conflict and so on. Moreover, there is a high demand for protection to these threat. Therefore, UN convention ensures the protection.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on UN convention on rights to migrate. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news sources Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers 78
- In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news sources Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers 66
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ity, there are issues pertaining to it. The lecturer disagrees and attacks each of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... migrants are painted as being suffering from poverty yet this is not the case as...
^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y to country either legally or illegally , there is elevating in economic instabil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32475884244 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80926516067 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585209003215 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7630358937 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4117647059 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115168557224 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316290351488 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408402837825 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651461896427 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551156196237 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.