A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness, and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Trust, generosity, and other moral values are among the most vital characteristics many people use to judge others. However, it is argued that people’s evaluation of others has currently been inclined toward their wealth and social status. From my perspective, I am totally against this argument.
One reason making me believe that one should not be judged by their wealth is that it does not reveal who exactly that person is. If all affluent people were considered perfect, then many of them such as celebrities would not be involved in scandals or spotted and criticised by the public for their misbehaviours. Many of the most recent instances can be found on social networking sites in which public figures, many of whom are well-judged for both their prosperity and wide influence, disappoint their followers through their immoral actions such as showing disrespect to other people or uttering arguments that provoke the public’s anger. Hence, one may be rich or have high social status, but it does not mean his other aspects are perfect.
Due to the above mentioned fact, the moral quality of a person remains to be a crucial factor for judgment today. This can be easily recognised through his actions; for example, one can express generosity towards other people by helping them financially or mentally. No matter what quality a person shows, he still gains respect from many people, especially from his loved ones, for having the person to whom he demonstrates one or many of his positive moral values or even a community benefitted. Therefore, these moral values are prioritised by a large number of employers when recruiting new staff.
In conclusion, not all wealthy people or those with large influence are well-behaved. Hence, to me, old-fashioned qualities never lose their importance in judging a person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | Nyahmeo | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Enkh_bold | 67 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 84
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 78
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... most vital characteristics many people use to judge others. However, it is argued ...
^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
..., these moral values are prioritised by a large number of employers when recruiting new staff. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1644295302 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76900950342 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614093959732 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0452094075 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152966540871 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586918788703 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327858668784 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100786500944 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172412167063 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.