Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent days, the proportion of buyers' choice in produce is increasing more and more. Since, the producers also consider more on their goods such as qualities or packaging of those productions. But It causes a negative effect on the environment, and in this essay, I will discuss some reasons and provide a few effective solutions for both two opinions.
To start with, in the last decade, we can see items of industries, companies or retailers are totally simple. Hence, the percentage of pollution quantities eliminated that could be controlled. But recently, meeting any need of customers has increased and having a lot of options on products. The operators have the responsibility to produce and decide what their goods look like on the market to attract their consumers. But they can use environmentally friendly alternatives for packing goods, instead of using a lot of shockproof poly bags for delivery.
On the other hand, buyers can make decisions on brands or products providing demand for their consumption. Furthermore, when shopping people have been more attracted to natural products packaging than that of unusual. In fact, the cost a customer has to pay for original goods will be higher than chemical goods. So, buyers will consider and balance their convenience when purchasing an item. However, people should avoid using high packaging goods and it is better to start using natural and less packing goods.
Personally, producers and buyers have a responsibility to protect the environment. Consumers should use less packing goods, and manufacturers should produce more original products with a reasonable cost. Consequently, reducing contamination in the environment and increasing revenue of companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 11
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people believe it is necessary but others think that it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinions 89
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are reasons what could be done to solve the problems 73
- NOWADAYS CELEBRITIES ARE MORE FAMOUS FOR THEIR GLAMOR AND WEALTH THAN FOR THEIR ACHIEVEMENTS AND THIS SET A BAD EXAMPLE TO YOUNG PEOPLE TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 73
- Some people think that young people should spend their time with family instead of outside entertainment others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or both two opinions. To start with, in the last decade, we can see items of ...
^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...educing contamination in the environment and increasing revenue of companies.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, look, so, as to, in fact, such as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40590405904 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02998095297 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.0431105115 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.5625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216802560086 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649902733453 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050927635162 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126342607901 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267067643118 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.