Nowadays families are not as close as they used to be. What do you think are the causes of this? What can be done to make families closer?
There is a general belief that the bonding between families is now not as strong as it was before. I believe that work pressure and mobile phone addiction are the main reasons for this issue; on the bright side, it is possible to bring families together by encouraging them to spend more time with one another.
To illustrate this, due to the increasing burden of work, it has become difficult for individuals to give the same amount of attention to their family members as they used to give. Due to the increased workload, they have to stay at work for long hours; therefore, they are unable to spend enough time with their family. In addition to this, due to the technology advancements people prefer to use social media apps, watch reels and connect to strangers over the internet instead of talking to their immediate family members. In fact, now family members rarely interact with one another and spend much of their time on their phones. For example, in olden times there was not much pressure and people used their phones only to make calls.
The first step to solving this problem is to realize that this is actually a problem. Many people are not even aware of that. They don’t find anything wrong with not talking to family. Once you are aware that you have to improve your relations, you can start working on it. There are several ways to improve bonding between family members. For example, they can make it a point to have dinner together. On the weekends, they can plan small outings with their family. If they are religious they can cultivate the habit of praying together.
In conclusion, we tend to be closer to the people we spend much of our time with. By simply finding various reasons to spend time together, families can enhance their bonding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-28 | Nguyên-MTTN | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | samdilnura | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | ndiep | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-07 | VIDHI PARMAR | 56 | view |
| 2020-08-16 | sarah830 | 67 | view |
- Many women are in workforce today but only few are in senior positions What causes this phenomenon Suggest possible solutions that would resolve this issue 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional live and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 67
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- In some places teenagers are encouraged to get part time jobs while they are still in school Do the advantages of teenagers working outweigh the disavantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n plan small outings with their family. If they are religious they can cultivate t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71704180064 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30045826496 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524115755627 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6764618814 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2941176471 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226357356221 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755593878371 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311253200095 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136593615011 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372395312332 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.