Many today feel that attention spans are becoming shorter due to the prevalence of social media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The widespread usage of social media is a major issue nowadays and is a cause for significant worry. Shorter attention spans that spark a contentious debate are a result of the phenomenon. This essay's main goal is to explain why I believe what I do, and I sincerely believe what I believe.
First off, I can't argue with how important social media is; it dominates most people's lives. As a result of the many practical tools it provides for users, it is quickly becoming more and more necessary. In reality, users may utilize this device as both an entertainment program and a supporter. As a result, some people are becoming less focused because they are becoming more hooked with utilizing social media. According to several research, utilizing social media for an extended period of time might make you stressed out while also making you sluggish and less focused on your work. An excellent illustration of this is how much time today's youth spends playing video games, chatting with friends, and browsing newsfeeds. That is how children spend their time when they should be learning or engaging in sports. Additionally, utilizing social media outside of accepted norms causes a lot of psychological issues. It is the outcome of knowledge that has been suppressed and might be stressful to your mental well-being. For instance, the antisocial and learning issues that affect younger generations. Many families struggle with it.
Additionally, social media is to blame for the decline in kids' participation in outdoor activities over time. This is due to the fact that kids become more dependent on social media and online activities than they are on playing with people or interacting in person.
In conclusion, I agree to some extent with this. Personally, I think individuals should focus more on their work and care more about their connections in real life.
- The graph below shows the proportions of workers in three different sections in South Korea from 1981 to 2011 78
- Many today feel that attention spans are becoming shorter due to the prevalence of social media To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram shows the production of bottled and canned carbonated water 78
- rate of each gender in 4 different countries in 2002 73
- Many today feel that attention spans are becoming shorter due to the prevalence of social media To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...believe what I believe. First off, I cant argue with how important social media i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some research'.
Suggestion: some research
...th utilizing social media. According to several research, utilizing social media for an extended...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... utilizing social media for an extended period of time might make you stressed out while also ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...t illustration of this is how much time todays youth spends playing video games, chatt...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08090614887 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77228623185 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57928802589 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4330744918 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2222222222 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237086046428 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664971961141 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498150491318 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131878875961 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521149443294 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.