The given table illustrates the spending on consumer goods of two different countries including Frace and the UK in the year 2010.
Overall, the outlay on consumer items in the UK was higher than in France in 2010. In the same year, money spent on cars was receiving the highest figures, while the opposite was true for perfume in the UK and cameras in France.
In terms of expenditure in France on consumer goods, cars recorded the highest statistic of 400,000 pounds, closely followed by computers at 380,000 pounds. The next highest figures were for books at 300,000 pounds, much higher than 200,000 pounds of perfume. Meanwhile, cameras had the lowest statistic at 150,000 pounds, making it become a good that inhabitants of France did not buy too much.
Turning to figures for the UK, spending on cars is the same in France but a higher amount spent at 450,000 pounds, way higher than books at 400,000 pounds. The next highest statistics were for computers and cameras, both at 350,000 pounds. Lastly, perfume recorded the figure of approximately 150,000 pounds, by far the lowest figure of the chart.
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 pounds sterling 67
- The line graph below shows the average carbon dioxide C02 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place in the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- Nowadays many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96808510638 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45917319851 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3901847789 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110834056208 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606801059937 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763903693231 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985384151559 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923727182126 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.