The given line graph depicts how the popularity of the consumption of fish and three types of meat in a country in Europe from 1979 to 2004.
At the beginning of the period, beef and lamb experienced the highest numbers with 220 and 150 grams, respectively. In the next three years, there was a moderate decline in the numbers of consumption of beef and lamb to 170 grams and 110 grams respectively. However, throughout the 16-year period, the amounts of beef and lamb consumed dropped to approximately 100 and 50 grams, respectively. Fish consumption also decreased but much less significantly to just below 50, and even though it was the less popular food, consumption levels were the most stable.
Turning to the figures for chicken, it came in third place in 1979 with 140 grams. During the 25-year period, there was a sharp increase in the consumption of chicken to nearly 250 grams in 2004.
Overall, there was a mix of changing patterns with respect to the figures for the consumption of fish and three types of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Throughout the period, the number of the use of fish was constantly receiving the lowest figures. Noticeably, the statistics of chicken recorded the most significant growth among all categories.
- Favourite leisure activities of teenagers in Canada 74
- The line graph below shows the average carbon dioxide C02 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 73
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...country in Europe from 1979 to 2004. At the beginning of the period, beef and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79957502763 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502325581395 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0194575251 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17046038887 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069747488468 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832210703123 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126418929343 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697990677285 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.