The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The pictures illustrate a number of important changes which took place in a park when it was established in 1920 and in the same park these days.
From the map, it is clear that the most noticeable change that occurred in the public park was the fountain and Stages for musicians. Moreover, the Glasshouse was replaced by a new Amphitheatre for concerts.
Looking at the maps in more detail, a fountain was located in the center in 1920. However, in 1920, it was transformed into a rose garden with four sitting areas surrounding it. In addition, some of the seating areas and the rose garden relocated at the corners were replaced.
On top of that, concerts are held in the Amphitheatre, which is the stage for musicians. In today's public park, the water features replace the Glasshouse at the bottom right. Beside Water features, the park was added to an underground car park and opposite it was a Children's play area. The café was also built next to the children's play area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by government and individuals to solve this problem 56
- Some people think movies should only be for entertainment Others think that they should also have educational values Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aced by a new Amphitheatre for concerts. Looking at the maps in more detail, a fo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ting areas surrounding it. In addition, some of the seating areas and the rose garden reloc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... relocated at the corners were replaced. On top of that, concerts are held in the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, moreover, so, in addition, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76744186047 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68098284408 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9839907769 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16560278318 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834104057037 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738008874176 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107868302131 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511128758882 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.