Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and addition to studying for a qualification. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
University students today are quite concerned about the many fields and subjects that are featured in the curriculum, especially in this new era of rising academic standards. Some have said that in order to complete the prerequisites for a future career, students should only focus on their primary domain. Some people think that we should offer a wide range of disciplines so that students can demonstrate their latent talents. Before expressing my personal beliefs in this article, I shall discuss both points of view.
In the first place, I firmly believe that concentrating on just one specific topic is quite advantageous for the following reasons: First off, knowing only one primary domain can increase your chances of landing long-term, reliable work along your chosen professional path. In addition, the problem with most concern nowadays is that children can not find their purpose for the next stage of their life, because they gathered knowledge from everywhere from every subject. As a consequence, they have the tendency to hop from their jobs every 6 months.
On the other hand, it is absolutely beneficial to learn different scopes of knowledge from various subjects. If students only learn and focus on just one particular domain, it is believed to be a very monotonous session. And with the well - rounded understanding and endless information about various subjects in school, students can adapt to new or alien pieces of information in their future jobs. Consequently, studying other subjects can be considered a necessary break from the intensive and stressful main subjects lesson, where you can boost worldwide knowledge alongside relaxing. Furthermore, in this new era, there is a gigantic number of students who may find their own unique talents in other subjects namely art, singing, or even sport. Studying extra subjects can give you some time to discover your own hidden talents as well as develop a decent range of skills for your future. For example, learning how to dance as a sports subject can offer students many chances to be more interactive, sociable, and confident when doing something in life.
To sum up, it seems that the likelihood of securing stable jobs and the reduced stress for students are the obvious advantages of the single subjects curriculum. I, however, believe that their existence can bring more advantages regarding the useful, different points of view and the chance to discover your hidden talents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 513, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'subjects'' or 'subject's'?
Suggestion: subjects'; subject's
...k from the intensive and stressful main subjects lesson, where you can boost worldwide k...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'subjects'' or 'subject's'?
Suggestion: subjects'; subject's
...re the obvious advantages of the single subjects curriculum. I, however, believe that th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23929471033 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7217631689 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564231738035 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8516630015 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8125 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347047787175 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106984798643 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426668475054 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193861166407 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750450174483 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.