The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014.
The line chart displays the proportion of the prices of three metals changing averagely per month during 2014.
Firstly, there was a sharp decrease in the average monthly change in the price of nickel. The figure of this metal started in January with 6% change compared with previous month, however, this number soon dropped significantly by 5% two months later before falling to a low of -3% in June, at which point the proportion kept going back and forth until it got 1% in December. Besides, the proportion of copper slightly fell down. After falling to a low of -0.5% in both May and June, the number soon went up by 1.5% and stayed uniform from July to September. This was followed by a drop to 0.5% in the next two months before rising for 1% change in price in December.
On the other hand, there was a ceiling trend in the figure of zinc. In January, the proportion of price change was 1%, after which the figure climbed by 2% just a month later before sinking to -1% in June. The figure then slightly recovered but reached the lowest point of -1% in October before going up in the last few months.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of households in the us by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts display the proportion of key sources of energy used in the USA between 1980s and 1990s
- The pie charts display the proportion of key sources of energy used in the USA between 1980s and 1990s
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 78
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47783251232 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26366338138 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9999020183 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271014086564 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127409959969 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158444908475 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253467721997 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184426690099 0.0819641961636 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47783251232 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26366338138 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9999020183 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271014086564 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127409959969 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158444908475 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253467721997 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184426690099 0.0819641961636 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.