The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school.
In contemporary society,
In contemporary society, there has been a growing debate concerning collaboration skills in children. Many hold the belief that the ultimate approach to increasing the cooperative competence of pupils is engaging in team sports at school. From my standpoint, I partially agree with this notion, and I will provide explanations throughout the course of this essay to support my viewpoint.
Undoubtedly, there are several merits when it comes to an emphasis on developing social collaboration skills through playing sports. One prominent benefit is that pupils working in a physical educational team will enhance their solved-problems skills. In fact, during a competition, regardless of the sport, teams have to deal with a variety of challenges and they need to deliver a workable alternative under pressure time. Another positive feature is that the younger generation learns the effectiveness of working together to reach a common goal. To extend this point, by playing a sporty team, they were forced to work with each other and uplifted the spirit of solidarity. Therefore, there are the strengths that sporty teamwork assists the basis of cooperation.
However, a counter-argument is that community integration skills can also be improved outside of group sports engagement. There is little doubt that those who are unable to play sports due to a handicap or a persistent sickness can still improve their ability to collaborate with the community in a variety of ways. Therefore, under no circumstances, it is not the only remedy to face this soft ability and child should involve in a variety of forms of activities in order to develop themself in different aspects.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding the efficacy of team-based activities in fostering collaboration remains a subject of importance. While I concur that engaging in such activities aids students in integrating into the community and developing certain social skills, I firmly advocate the significance of diversifying their experiences through participation in a broader range of activities to attain greater intellectual growth and wisdom.
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school In contemporary society 84
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...rning collaboration skills in children. Many hold the belief that the ultimate approach t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49085365854 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21255108265 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600609756098 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9331981783 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.642857143 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15253010766 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488850626747 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607910077256 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871872953315 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604380306969 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.