The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The pie chart illustrates the percentage of different kinds of takeaways consumed by residents living in Canada. On the other hand, the bar chart indicates the figure of Indian restaurants located in Canada. 

Generally, it can be seen in the pie chart that Thai food experienced the highest percentage of customers. On contrary, Mexican, Greek and Japanese takeaways had the lowest consumption. Besides, it is obvious that the number of Indian restaurants fluctuated and unstable over the surveyed period. 

34% of the Canadian population were fond of eating Thai takeaway food, which made this kind of food the most popular in the country. Indian food ranked second, accounting for 26%. There was a similar proportion of Italian, Persian, and other takeaway foods, with 10%, 9%, and 11% respectively. Both Greek, Japanese and Chinese takeout meals experienced a figure of 1% . 

There was a rise in the number of Indian restaurants from 1960 to 2007. Despite a stable period from 2007 to 2009, this proportion started falling slightly in 2011 and increased again in 2015. 

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-02 TLan168 view
2023-08-01 TLan168 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of Indian restaurants located in Canada.  Generally, it can be seen in the pie cha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and unstable over the surveyed period.  34% of the Canadian population were fond...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...takeout meals experienced a figure of 1% .  There was a rise in the number of I...
^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...keout meals experienced a figure of 1% .  There was a rise in the number of Indian...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, second, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21714285714 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78581831308 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6946867647 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188138129234 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749285884397 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456073608378 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116822305802 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639748948948 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.