In this era of global innovation, the increasing number of people using online platforms to work or study from home has caused a level of controversy around the world. In my opinion, I support the view that this trend might be more harmful rather than beneficial to citizens and the whole society.
To begin with, there would be a variety of negative impacts of telecommuting and telestudy on individuals. First, teleworkers and students, without doubt, are more prone to spend a myriad of hours on computers, leading to the lack of face-to-face interaction and outdoor activities. As a consequence, there are good possibilities that they could be susceptible to loneliness and physical health problems. In fact, it is evident that the light from a computer screen would be harmful for eyesight, resulting in vision impairment. Moreover, since people might not experience any strict observation from managers, teachers or colleagues during the process, they are more likely to get distracted from the surrounding environment and other social media platforms, causing a significant decrease in productivity and attention span. For instance, one of the top distractions when you work from home can be your kids or spouse, they can talk loudly, run around and make some noise.
In addition, it is widely accepted that working or studying from home would have detrimental effects on the community. Initially, since remote workers and students simply don’t have as easy of a time developing rapport with a team that has the benefits of in-person, candid conversations and spontaneous brainstorms, the social culture can be damaged. Second, there is also a risk that human beings may work too many hours due to less separation between work and home, which can result in overtime obligations or employee burnout. Furthermore, people also have to face a higher data security burden when their tasks are being done at multiple locations on multiple devices, which can be harmful to their private life. A standard example is that nowadays cybercriminals are able to access personal data easily and blackmail victims by threatening to expose their private information.
In conclusion, my opinion is that the application of technology to work and study from home has brought several significant drawbacks such as the aforementioned above. However, companies and schools should take this issue into consideration for long-term goals.
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 93
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32207792208 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99114338933 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612987012987 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8404912993 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256760781906 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807710327033 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651559146572 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158935352878 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377558367735 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32207792208 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99114338933 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612987012987 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8404912993 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256760781906 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807710327033 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651559146572 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158935352878 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377558367735 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.