In many societies, foraging has been a leisure activity enjoyed by some individuals. Foraging involves searching and gathering wild food resources such as fruits, nuts, mushrooms, and edible plants. Proponents argue that foraging is not only a recreational pursuit but also a way to connect with nature and promote sustainability. However, critics argue that foraging can have negative impacts on the environment and may not be a suitable leisure activity for everyone.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Write at least 250 words.
In recent years, foraging becomes not only a leisure activity for people to find balances and to escape from daily exhausted life but also a way to reconnect with nature and wildlife. In contrast, critics do not support that statement, and foragers are thought to affect seriously on the wild environment. I definitely agree with the first statement. This essay will discuss both pros and cons of foraging, plus support the first point.
On the one hand, foraging is claimed to help people reconnect wild nature and maintain balance. According to the research in German in 2021, 85 percent people agreed that foraging has changed their life significantly, while more than 93 percent of them have obtained at least a benefit from it. During the Covid-19 pandemic, many people dealt with various mental problems: stress, boring and anxious. Fortunately, foraging brings their mood back and creates tons of positive impacts by just simply spending time walking through the forest and searching edible plants such as: nettles, berries, mushrooms, etc. In addition, since these foods are completely free, foraging helps reduce monthly food expenses during the high inflation period. Moreover, it is believed that this type of food refers to "super food", which contains high nutrition, vitamins and is organic. Consequently, people stand on the other side have contrasting looks at this activity.
Critics contend that foraging is devastating the wild life and ecosystem, but I disagree that foragers will make catastrophically negative impacts. Although foraging has seen a slightly increasing in the last 3-years (from 2019). However, statistics point out that foraging may not rapidly develop in a short period of time to be out of control. Firstly, in Hanoi and in other big Asia’s cities, there are not many forests or places suitable for citizens to scavenge. Indeed, if people want to forage, they may be quite active because they must go to countryside or botanical garden, which is too far away. For those reasons, foraging is suitable for some people who are active, have time and right place. Imagine that you only have one or two day at the weekend to replenish lost energy after a whole long, hard-working week at your company, most people will spend that time to take a long sleep and laze around. But these people don’t cause any threat to this activity.
In conclusion, foraging is a helpful activity for people who’d loved to maintain stability life, and surrounded by nature. Moreover, foraging won’t cause any serious impact in the nearby future. I will always support this activity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | annaalysia007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | annaalysia007 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | annaalysia007 | 78 | view |
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers Summarise the information by selec 73
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers Summarise the information by selec 73
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes which have occurred Do you think these changes are positive or negative 11
- The graph below shows the average closing prices of selected precious metals from 2013 to 2021 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...make catastrophically negative impacts. Although foraging has seen a slightly increasing...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ging may not rapidly develop in a short period of time to be out of control. Firstly, in Hanoi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, at least, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17176470588 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60508313332 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607058823529 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.123313537 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9090909091 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232369970363 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06577424179 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546514808134 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14489955158 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192014745151 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.