Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

It is undeniable that there are multiple factors in a child’s success. There is a school of thought that school friend is the bigger contributor to their success than parents. From my perspective, I completely disagree with this statement due to such reason as below.

First of all, parents used to experience the same situation as their children, therefore, they are fully aware of how to educate them properly, from personal qualities to acknowledgements. It is essential that offspring listen to their progenitors, who have undertaken so many things to be their parents. As a result, parents fully understand their own children tp teach them appropriately so that their child would have a rounded development in his life.
Secondly, parents have the ability to assist children broaden their mind by spending time with their progenies escaping new places to learn new things. Furthermore, there is no denying that parents enable their child to learn more by having a mentor tutor him on account of their financial support. In particularly, provided that their child do not comprehend the lessons in class, it is necessary that a mentor help him with revising the lessons and acquire more knowledge by allowing the child to approach various kinds of homework and scientific studying methods, which make their performances in school improve considerably. As a result, the child can learn a lot and perform well in any contests in school due to his parents' financial ability.

To sum up, I am firmly of the opinion that the part of parents cannot be underestimated in comparison with peers to reach a desirable result at school.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in particular, as a result, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09293680297 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.919217028 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5500565778 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.545454545 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196764705998 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837272077487 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425751300128 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127322414773 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719854925351 0.056905535591 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in particular, as a result, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09293680297 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.919217028 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5500565778 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.545454545 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196764705998 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837272077487 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425751300128 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127322414773 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719854925351 0.056905535591 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.