Human activities have negative effects on plants and animals species. Some people think it is too late to do a anything about this problem, Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation.
Discuss both views and give our opinion.
Opinions are divided on whether human effort to improve severe environmental problems is futile. It is true that biological diversity conservation is a challenging procedure, but I am of the opinion that several measures should be proposed to alleviate this consequence.
On the one hand, throughout the history of human development, their activities, such as hunting and desforesting, have detrimentally affected almost all species on the planet. There is numerous archaeological evidence demonstrating the extinction of several creatures related to local people. Furthermore, these phenomena may be exacerbated more than ever before, leading to scientists’ dedication to recovering such species becoming desperate. On the other hand, global warming, which is an undeniable result associated with human destructive activities, also negatively impacts many species’s habitats, shrinking their distribution and reducing their survival abilities irreversibly.
Despite the previously mentioned difficulties, various solutions could bring effective changes to plant and animal species’ lives. First and foremost, the government should release pertinent regulations and adopt laws related to protecting creatures in danger of extinction, which attach severe punishments to prevent hunting animals and gathering plants for medicine and food purposes. Additionally, in light of the unbelievable progress in the biomedical sciences, accumulating research suggests effective procedures to conserve the genes of species that are extinct or in danger.
In conclusion, although the drawbacks of protecting species and their habitats induced by human activities are undeniable, I maintain that, with the government’s pertinent regulations and academic studies supporting them, this phenomenom may be improved to a certain level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-04 | viviannguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- Today TV channels broadcast man s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 67
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- Today TV channels broadcast man s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 73
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.23320158103 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31764915555 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683794466403 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4139355906 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.7 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210234727988 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746018634342 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414461366612 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119065401807 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266887795818 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.15 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.93 8.58950901804 139% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.23320158103 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31764915555 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683794466403 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4139355906 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.7 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210234727988 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746018634342 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414461366612 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119065401807 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266887795818 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.15 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.93 8.58950901804 139% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.