It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?
In the contemporary era, the accessibility and affordability of international travel have precipitated a surge in the number of individuals embarking on journeys abroad. While this phenomenon may entail minor drawbacks for local cultures and environments, I staunchly assert that it predominantly yields positive outcomes by bolstering countries' economies and enriching their cultural and literary landscapes.
On one hand, empirical evidence suggests that travel has an unexpected yet salutary impact on individuals' mental and physical well-being. As tourists traverse foreign lands, they are exposed to diverse customs, traditions, and ways of life, thus expanding their horizons and fostering a more cosmopolitan outlook. Engaging with indigenous activities and immersing in distinct cultural nuances nurtures a heightened sense of appreciation for cultural diversity, subsequently mitigating instances of racial prejudice and xenophobia. This progressive shift in perspective contributes to a more harmonious global community.
In addition to these commendable advantages, the burgeoning travel industry significantly fortifies countries' economies. Developing nations, in particular, stand to gain substantial revenues from tourism, enabling governments to channel funds into critical sectors such as education and healthcare. The influx of international tourism has also catalyzed employment opportunities, effectively curbing unemployment rates and elevating the quality of life for local populations. Furthermore, the infrastructure enhancements necessitated by the demands of tourism serve as dual-purpose assets, concurrently benefiting both visitors and residents. This virtuous cycle has the potential to attract skilled immigrants, bolstering the workforce and contributing to a diverse and thriving society.
In conclusion, while concerns exist about potential downsides of global tourism, I vehemently advocate for the promotion of this trend by both official bodies and individuals alike. The myriad benefits, encompassing personal development and economic progress, far outweigh the transient challenges that may arise. It is imperative that nations embrace the opportunities afforded by increased travel to cultivate cross-cultural understanding, fortify their economies, and foster a more interconnected and prosperous world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | viviannguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
| 2017-02-22 | Yolanda Wang | 87 | view |
- Today TV channels broadcast man s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 67
- The diagram below shows how drinking water is produced using a solar powered water pump and water filter Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of female students on four different course at one university from 1970 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 84
- Children nowadays watch TV programmes more than ever before Is watching television good or bad for children 78
- The chart below shows the number and purposes of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.48089171975 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46588275912 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68152866242 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.500795115 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.357142857 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148465803011 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436037690302 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293201230911 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869208992475 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220683394548 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 6.84 50.2224549098 14% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 11.3001002004 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.6 12.4159519038 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.87 8.58950901804 150% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 78.4519038076 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.48089171975 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46588275912 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68152866242 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.500795115 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.357142857 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148465803011 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436037690302 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293201230911 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869208992475 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220683394548 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 6.84 50.2224549098 14% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 11.3001002004 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.6 12.4159519038 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.87 8.58950901804 150% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 78.4519038076 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.