Some people believe that using taxpayer funds to look for life on their planets is important. Others, however, think that it’s a waste of public money because there are much more important issues requiring funding on our own planet.
Nowadays, many people think that using taxes money to search for life on another planet is a useful idea, on the other hand, a lot of people think that money should be spent on more important things, taxes money that we pay to the government, we should decide on what can be spent.
At this time of life, most people believe in aliens and other life on other planets, which is something -nobody knows yet-, eventually, scientists research a lot for a long time to know the secret behind creating planets and the solar system, and if there are more planets, thousands of curious questions need answers and explanation, or maybe for immigration from Earth, scary of any Nuclear war, like the Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, from second wild war, sometimes humans are the most dangerous creature for himself and for the hole planets.
However, people who are against the main idea of searching in space with taxes money, believe that considered a waste of money on the ground, on research that does not come with any benefits for anyone of the people who really needed, in addition, there are a lot of people, children died every year from hunger and cold in South Africa, Syria, Senegal, and many of countries that need money for feed the citizens, build houses for them, or to make schools and hospitals.
meanwhile, I think there are a lot of different helpful ways to use taxes money instead of going with the flow of somebody's beliefs or visions, like aliens or other lives.
- Some believe that people today have no interest in maintaining the traditional culture of their country or region Others believe that it is still important to people that we preserve a traditional way of life Discuss both these views and give your own opi 73
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962 84
- Take a look at the question and the graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the info 67
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...m, or to make schools and hospitals. meanwhile, I think there are a lot of different h...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, second, so, while, i think, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73563218391 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33404100021 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567049808429 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 16.0721442886 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 65.0 20.2975951904 320% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 152.534217473 49.4020404114 309% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 309.0 106.682146367 290% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 65.25 20.7667163134 314% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 21.0 7.06120827912 297% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250557845476 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144377103811 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614543230562 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144377103811 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614543230562 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 33.5 13.0946893788 256% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 13.96 50.2224549098 28% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.5 11.3001002004 243% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.1 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 9.78957915832 266% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 28.0 10.1190380762 277% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 10.7795591182 260% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.