The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrate how many graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in the UK in 2008.
Overall, the data of graduates examined is tenfold than postgraduates. In addition, the number who joined in further study were the most highest work that both graduates and post graduates, while voluntary work attracted the least in the surveys.
It can be seen that graduate students were interested in further study, which the number reached at around 30,000. Post graduates had a similar change, but to lesser extent at 2,725 students. Followed the figure of further study was the data of part-time work, which exacty 17,735 graduate students and 2,535 post graduates.
The less drew activity was voluntary work for both two groups of students, arrived at a lowest point in the bar charts (3,500 for graduates and 345 for post graduates). The third place of the four categories in two bar charts was unemployment, which showed by the figure 16,235 for graduate students and one-tenth for post graduate students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-03 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Tran Kim Ngoc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | rvw | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...er who joined in further study were the most highest work that both graduates and post gradu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the highest'.
Suggestion: most the highest
...er who joined in further study were the most highest work that both graduates and post gradu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...both two groups of students, arrived at a lowest point in the bar charts 3,500 fo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06818181818 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60658634144 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.047247022 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251992421709 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122823198743 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162506468412 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202751517843 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199360566403 0.0819641961636 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.