The best way to reduce poverty in developing countries is by giving up to six years of free education, so that they can at least read, write and use numbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The proposition of providing up to six years of free education as a solution to diminish poverty in some developing countries is a matter of paramount importance. Despite the significant role that basic education can play, I firmly believe that the effectiveness of this strategy is limited and should be complemented by more comprehensive and multifaceted measures.
On the one hand, it is evident that offering six years of education can establish a strong foundation and alleviate financial strain by equipping individuals with fundamental skills and knowledge. The ability to read, write, and use numbers empowers them to make informed decisions and engage in productive activities, which develops a sense of confidence and contributes positively to personal success and society. Additionally, giving six years of free education can alleviate the financial burden on families. As a result, education will be more accessible for marginalized communities, especially those who cannot afford their children's school fees, thereby breaking the cycle of poverty.
On the other hand, obviously, only one solution cannot holistically deal with the challenge of poverty. Primary education may lack the knowledge and skills needed in this rapid globalization and technological advancement. Thus, the government should extend subsidized education to secondary and higher levels, enhancing employability and equipping individuals for complex economic landscapes nowadays. Moreover, multifaceted solutions are necessitated for this deeply rooted issue. In my viewpoint, solely focusing on education may overlook other critical factors such as job opportunities, healthcare, better living conditions, and robust social safety nets so we should integrate a variety of methods of both education and real-life together as catalysts in order to foster and enrich potential personal careers more successfully.
In conclusion, while giving up to six years of free education is a commendable method, more comprehensive ways to reduce poverty in developing countries should be applied to deal with this matter in a more advantageous way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | too3ig | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | HManh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-16 | hieu13092006 | 71 | view |
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries and the pie chart shows the percentages of books by type that were borrowed over this time 89
- Some people say that when deciding taxes government should prioritize health care Others think that there are more important priorities for tax payers money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In many parts of the world people do research on their family history Some people believe that finding out about previous generations is a useful thing to do However others believe that it is better to focus on present and future generations Discuss both 84
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media Do you think it is the reason for the growth in the rate of juvenile crime What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation 84
- The best way to reduce poverty in developing countries is by giving up to six years of free education so that they can at least read write and use numbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78274760383 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2590521723 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594249201278 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8324999951 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.833333333 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257986105599 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920864287271 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933849646372 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175277089739 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794877516593 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.